Skip to content

Links: Happy 4th!


Image © Luciano Romano/Change Performing Arts, via NYT.

Happy fourth of July! After a week of vacation, I’m back to active duty. In the meantime, a few interesting things happened that are worth noting.

  • The end of the panorama? Olympus has announced a prototype for a 360 degree camera.
  • Regina Hackett and Chas Bowie have both put out “top-ten” photo blog lists. They’re much more diverse lists than my narrow blogroll, and worth checking out to see what suits your own tastes. A few updates to my own roll will be happening soon. (Page 291 was proud to make That’s a Negative’s top list. Thanks Chas!)
  • Clear your mind’s eye, because what you imagine before looking at something influences how you see it.
  • The NYT reports on the cinematic visuals that Peter Greenaway has used to transform The Last Supper, but NY Mag’s Vulture goes one better and finds a video of part of the performance from the Guardian.
  • Camera-to-camera sabotage: this new device allows you to secretly project your own images onto other people’s photographs as they make them.

Links and Travel

I’ll be traveling for the next week. I might have enough access for sporadic updates, but until then, enjoy the blogroll and the following links.

  • More great coverage of PhotoEspaña–this time on landscape photographers–from WMMNA. I found at least two projects I didn’t know about–by Joachim Koester and Simon Starling–that look worth more time than I can give them here.
  • The Museum of the Moving Image has put together an interesting site of reviews, critical essays, and research guides on television and cinema.
  • DARPA is developing binoculars that learn how to identify threats from soldiers.

James Mollison at Hasted Hunt

Fandom is complex. It may begin as admiration–for talent, for style, for success–but the twists and turns it takes as it grows or extinguishes, and especially as it is nurtured into an obsession, have been largely uncharted waters for visual artists. There are signs that that’s changing. Ryan McGinley explored Morrissey fans in his recent series “Irregular Regulars,” and now James Mollison’s “The Disciples”–panoramic views of fans leaving concerts–are on display at Hasted Hunt.

Mollison has chosen to focus on those fans whose devotion is most immediately visually apparent. The subjects of his panoramas, which feature groups of roughly seven music fans standing side by side against a white background, were all picked because they chose to dress like the musician whose concert they had just attended. Evaluated for visual punchiness alone, Mollison’s technique works, but his view of fandom is a superficial one–not probing enough to provide any insight into the psychology of his subjects, and not subjective enough for the photographs to merit serious contemplation on their own terms.

If “The Disciples” doesn’t take an approach that allows him to probe into the fan phenomenon, his technique does raise several tangential questions. Many of Mollison’s subjects are clearly dressing like their idols, to the point of wearing t-shirts and hats branded after the musicians they love. But in almost every picture, there’s a gray area, a person or two whose inclusion in the line-up seems to say more about Mollison’s assumptions than it does about the fans themselves. Is a man wearing oversized Orioles gear really emulating 50 Cent, who was born and raised in Queens and now lives in Connecticut? Or is he simply dressing in a style the art crowd loosely associates with “gangsta”? It’s difficult to know if we’re looking at photographs that document idolatry, or photographs that demonstrate Mollison’s assumptions about different styles of dress. It’s also unclear how specific these cults of personality really are. Are Marilyn Manson fans dressing to be like Marilyn Manson, or are Manson and his fans both channeling a similar Goth style and ideal that makes them look as if one is the primary influence on the other? It’s a shame that “The Disciples” only raises these questions incidentally, as a byproduct of what it’s trying to do.

The other work in the show is Mollison’s older series, “James and Other Apes.” It consists of portraits of assorted primates–orangutans, chimpanzees, and bonobos–photographed in a close-cropped style that only reveals their faces. It’s surprising to see Mollison’s work at Hasted Hunt only a few months after Martin Schoeller’s “Close Up,” since “James and Other Apes” could easily be read as a parody of the dead-on facial focus that characterizes the work of Schoeller and so many other contemporary photographers. But “James and other Apes” isn’t really a parody. It demonstrates the photographer’s unusual respect for the monkeys’ individual physiognomies–something that sets it apart from Jill Greenberg’s more exploitative animal work, which looks to other species primarily as mirrors in which to see cute reflections of human emotions. “James and Other Apes” reminds us that, although our gazes at animals normally stop short at classification or amusement, other creatures possess surprising degrees of individuality that only a field biologist or zookeeper normally takes the time to appreciate.

Juxtaposing these images with those of Mollison’s fans makes for a funny gag: the apes look as distinct as humans, and the humans look like mindless adherents of “monkey see, monkey do.” That amusement is short-lived, however. What remains is an impression that the show has shortchanged the fans in “The Disciples,” with the comparison between the series serving to highlight Mollison’s reductionist take on the mentality of his pop idolaters.

“The Disciples & James and Other Apes” runs from June 12 to August 16, 2008. All images © James Mollison.

Links

  • Theorists have made a fuss for a while now about how the body is “inscribed” or made “legible” by society. Here’s the process in real-time: a new tool allows police to identify suspects based on tattoos, scars, and other visible bodily markers.
  • Square America is probably the most thoughtfully curated collection of vernacular photographs I’ve ever seen. Very impressive. (via Utne)
  • The NYT delves into the arduous making of “The Road to Freedom,” the exhibition of Civil Rights photographs at the High Museum in Atlanta.
  • Images can now be stored in particle clouds. (Unfortunately, this is a subscriber-only piece, but you can get the gist from the preview.)

Weegee’s New York in the NYT

The NYT has put together a nice little feature on Weegee for “Weekend Explorer,” including a video segment that shows some of the once-gritty neighborhoods where Weegee stalked his prey and even an interactive map of the locations of some of his most famous shots. Definitely recommended, if only for the anecdotes that give added life to the story of this famous photographic sociopath. Who knew, for instance, that Weegee carried salami and cigars in the trunk of his car? Or that his ashes sat in a box with a pile of his photos until ICP received them in the ’90s?

Sally Gall at Julie Saul Gallery

For those who haven’t noticed, Cara Phillips and Amy Elkins have been up to more than their usual blog posts. They recently established a new website, Women in Photography, devoted to showcasing the work of contemporary female photographers. I mention it now because WIP pointed me to Julie Saul Gallery, where Sally Gall’s work “Crawl” is currently showing.

Gall’s latest body of work takes a bit of getting used to. Historically, she has more or less walked the walk of a black-and-white purist, so it’s no surprise that this new series adopts as its unspoken mantra one of the older clichés of the photographic medium: the idea that photography teaches us to “slow down” and “really look at things.” But truisms are nothing more than the generalization and endless repetition of something that starts off true, and “Crawl” really does make you slow down, although it takes time to get into the rhythm of life that Gall has chosen to photograph. Her focus on certain choice details–the tiny projecting hooks of a beetle’s feet poking off the sides of a stalk of grass, the precarious balance of a daddy longlegs straddling the gap between two distant plants–eventually wins even a skeptical viewer to her unique brand of backyard naturalism. Within a few minutes I found myself marveling at the dense jungle that a meadow becomes when seen from the perspective of a caterpillar.

That may be what separates Gall from scientific nature photographers like Alex Wild or biological photographic artists like Catherine Chalmers. The insects, arachnids, and gastropods Gall photographs feature as minute figures in a lush landscape of flowers, grass, and weeds. They are big enough to merit notice, but not so large that they become the sole object of scrutiny. They simply exist as figures against a larger background, not unlike the tiny, awed observers in Romantic landscape painting. You might say that Sally Gall has found a way to deliver to people an entirely new sense of wonder at the vastness of the world–a slug’s sense of the sublime, a reminder, to quote Thom Gunn, that most of us, looking at a snail’s trail in the undergrowth,

“would never have
imagined the slow passion
to that deliberate progress.”

“Crawl” runs at Julie Saul Gallery from May 13 to June 28, 2008. All images © Sally Gall.

Links

Links


Still from the New York Times.
  • Tony Schwarz, creator of the masterful “Daisy Ad” that helped LBJ defeat Barry Goldwater and also changed the course of American political campaigning, died Saturday, the NYT reports.
  • The world of online photography criticism recently got a whole lot richer with the addition of a new online magazine, 1000 Words, and a great new West coast photography crit blog, That’s A Negative. Check them out–as far as I’m concerned, they’re already required reading.
  • Never one to be outdone by the Catholic church, the London Natural History Museum is considering Darwin-inspired proposals for a permanent art installation within its walls. See the slideshow here.
  • Forget Austin Powers: Alastair Gordon has produced a new book that shows how the ’60s aesthetic, now the brunt of so many jokes, actually represented a revolutionary break from traditional domestic values.
  • The glistening and painful-looking miracle of human ovulation, captured for the first time in photographs and on video.

Laurie Simmons at Carolina Nitsch Project Room

If Carolina Nitsch Project Room isn’t the smallest storefront gallery in Chelsea, it must be in the top three. Maybe that’s what makes it so successful. Every time I go, it’s packed with an interesting show that is just big enough to contain something worthwhile but still small enough not to get on my nerves with a glut of mediocre material.

Nitsch is currently showing “In And Around the House,” the first gallery survey of Laurie Simmons’s early black-and-white photographs. Taken from 1976-8, these photographs provide a neat glimpse into the fetal stages of Simmons’s now famous aesthetic. In them, it’s possible to see a pared-down version of the tropes that Simmons would become known for later in life–the surrealist critiques of femininity and consumer culture that turned magazine, toy, and advertising aesthetics on their heads.

Much of the exhibition is arranged into series that form almost-stories, monochromatic comic strips in which a tiny female figurine wrestles with inexplicable dilemmas: a chair that needs to be lifted onto the back of a tow truck, or living room sets that disappear only to be replaced by chalk outlines. There is something dreamlike in the allure of these narratives, and Simmons’s little figurine is inevitably the sympathetic character. In her most realistic work, the toy woman meanders around a well-stocked kitchen, apparently waiting for something. The amount of emotion Simmons squeezes from an expressionless, stiff-jointed toy is testimony to her extraordinary talent as an artist.

The exhibition is accompanied by a great little monograph from Carolina Nitsch and Hatje Cantz. It includes an essay by Carol Squiers, who notes that–somewhat ironically–Simmons began working with toy sets in hopes of getting a commercial job as a photographer for a toy company. Also tucked into this monograph is an insightful autobiographical essay by Simmons, including reminiscences about the way her sense of space was affected by growing up in a home that did double duty as her father’s dentist office. This is a must-see exhibition for anyone interested in the origins of Simmons’s work, and a refreshingly concise and well-presented show in the often dreary Chelsea summer.

“In And Around the House” runs from May 17 to June 28, 2008.

Image © Laurie Simmons.

Links: 291 Turns 1!


Image © Amy Arbus.

Page 291 celebrates its first birthday today. Thanks to everyone for reading! I’ve been a little bit M.I.A. recently, falling back on links instead of reviews, commentary, etc. That should change next week, although summer is obviously a lighter season and I’ll be moving slightly outside the city in the fall. Still, expect me to work more diligently to provide more substantial meat in the coming weeks.

  • Return of the Medicis? The Vatican has decided to step up and embrace contemporary art–even going to so far as to attend the next Venice Biennale.
  • A pop culture critic gets angry about cell phone pictures–and rightfully so. Camera phones are getting better, but their uses are still limited. They seem to prove that people are more interested in the act of taking pictures (as something to do and show around) than in what the pictures they take look like or how their aggregated behavior affects everyone around them. (via AFC)
  • A newspaper’s take on the history of newspaper photography. It reads sort of like a middle school essay on the history of photojournalism, probably because a newspaper isn’t the proper place to examine the subject. Interesting takeaway: early newspaper photographs sometimes ran months after the events they depicted.
  • Here’s a show I wish I could see: “Live By the Lens, Die By the Lens” at the National Media Museum in Bradford, UK.

    Image © Amy Arbus.